For books to be read and well noticed, they should contain some ideas that angrily resonate with many people, yet they still should stay in this range of plausible credibility, when the facts are still detectable and the behaviour of well known figures is pretty much down to earth for the readers to be sure what is what or whatever. Right?
So, I want to as, if a controversy of a book can overcome its credibility and in what way can it happen if possible? Sometimes I feel like the scales are broken and nothing is as it seemed or something. Help! Have you any thoughts about it?
by RiverOtterDen