February 2026
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    232425262728  

    I saw another post for suggestions of movies that do the book justice and wanted to find the opposite. Suggest a book that is just as good or better even if you've watched the movie first.

    by JSpell

    24 Comments

    1. The Artemis Fowl books. Wildly popular with kids, with some interesting ways to look at ethics and morality. The movie was an embarrassing cringe fest from beginning to end devoid of any charm or soul. 

    2. mmwhatchasaiyan on

      The Exorcist. People can say what they want, but the book was 10000x better than the movie.

      I saw the movie about 20 years ago, then recently read the book, then rewatched the movie, and the movie did not hold up after reading. It seemed so *flat* compared to the book.

    3. Pretend-Piece-1268 on

      I disliked the movie adaptation of The Golden Compass, based on Philip Pullmans novel. Visually it looked great but the dialogue was terrible and they cut off a great part at the end. The series adaptation was better.

    4. Most-Artichoke6184 on

      Memoirs of an invisible man. They decided to make Chevy Chase visible the entire movie.

    5. Blecher_onthe_Hudson on

      It’s the rule rather than the exception! Partly it’s just that most novels contain far more dialog and plot than can be contained in a 2 hr film. But some really shred the original material, like Starship Troopers. Sometimes it’s just really miscast.

    6. glittersparklythings on

      Room by Emma Donoghue

      And I don’t think anyone else could have made a better movie. The way the narration is in the book just makes it incredibly hard to write it into a movie.

    7. World War Z by Max Brooks- the book is a genuinely well done horror/science fiction and the mock ‘oral history’ format is a key part of its charm/impact. The movie… not so much

    8. PatchworkGirl82 on

      I was honestly disappointed in Stardust. I had the large edition of the book with big illustrations by Charles Vess, and I don’t think live action did it justice. I always pictured it as a Ghibli movie, very fluid and colorful (I think a Totoro plush actually has a cameo in one of Vess’ illustrations)

      I did love Michelle Pfeiffer and her goats though

    9. The Bourne identity (and the sequels). I mean, the movies had a Jason Bourne in them, but that’s where it stops.

    10. “In a Lonely Place” is a perfectly good noir film, but it is very different from the book and completely misses the point of the book and what makes it interesting.

    11. Illustrious-Onion329 on

      Time Traveler’s Wife. I was very disappointed in the movie though HBO did a decent 1 season series of the book.

    12. Writing_Bookworm on

      Far too many book adaptations are disappointing.

      The Lovely Bones. Peter Jackson was just not the right director. It was too fantastical when it should have been much more grounded and simple. It also started so slowly. Stanley Tucci was the only good part.

      It was intentionally designed to be different from my understanding but I haven’t been able to watch The girl with all the gifts. I loved the book and how different it was to others in a similar genre and I couldn’t understand why they changed so much. They moved it from a white clinical almost medical setting to a bunker, swapped the races of the two lead characters, and changed a character that was notably described as smartly dressed in heels and always somehow having red lipstick into a more rough soldier looking character played by Glenn Close. That character was all the more awful because she presented the way she did, it doesn’t have the same impact otherwise.

      Not a film but I couldn’t make it through a single episode of the netflix adaptation of All the light we cannot see. The accents were bizarre, the pronunciation of the french words…

    Leave A Reply