I haven’t read either book yet, but I noticed how Sapiens has a lot of criticism about it being biased, opinionated, eurocentric, and more importantly, inaccurate; that a lot of the knowledge it contains is outdated even when it was published. On the plus side, it’s an enjoyable read for many.
Dawn of Everything however, has a lot of praise. Both are thick books so I’m wondering if it’s worth reading both or should I just read the latter?
by anonymon35