It seems that every other request for a new book to read or recommendation mentions a "plot twist". What is the deal?
Firstly, if you know that a plot twist is coming, doesn't that by definition eliminate the suspense? Doesn't it make you spend the book looking for the twist? By definition, what made Agatha Christie so great, was the unexpectedness of her twists. Now we have people knowing that it is coming and asking for it.
Secondly, a book can be excellent without a twist. Being fooled or oblivious of the end isn't necessary for great storytelling. Knowing the villain does not preclude suspense or enjoyment. Look at Dracula, Dorian Gray, Count Fosco.
A great mystery book can be read for the interaction of the characters or building of the story.
I despair of readers that look for a bigger and bigger fix when reading. I see it happen in television shows where every season demands a more gruesome serial killer or more explosive abduction.
For heaven's sake people, dial it down a notch. Read some Josephine Tey.
*** I specifically chose older writers/books on the idea that most readers are familiar with them.
by Maorine
3 Comments
>By definition, what made Agatha Christie so great, was the unexpectedness of her twists.
Oh no, you just completely spoiled Agatha Christie for me because now I know that her stories have twists!
I detest plot twist They’re often just for shock value, are unrealistic per the plot and add little to the story But readers love them so publishers egg on for bigger and more shocking
I don’t think this is true of all readers, or even most of them. Just readers of certain genres.