May 2026
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031

    I read and provide my thoughts on Piranesi

    ON THE TWENTIETH DAY OF THE SECOND MONTH OF THE YEAR THE CAT CAME TO THE FIRST BEDROOM OF THE MAIN HOUSE

    I read Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell way back in the day when it came out, and was really blown away by it. Susanna Clarke's ability to combine a Victorian literary style with fantasy, and the sheer level of detail, along with the delightful prose and characters, was a joy to read. So needless to say that I was pretty excited about finally getting to read Piranesi.

    Piranesi is just about the polar opposite of JS&MN in style and tone. It's much more focused on vibe and atmosphere than detailed plot and worldbuilding, and creates a wonderful dreamlike mood throughout the whole story. That's not to say that there isn't any plot, and it's actually quite compelling. I'm a sucker for parallel/multiple-world stories and this was a really great variation of that. The concept of being in the other world of the House slowly removing your memories is a clever way of implementing the plot twist of Piranesi being Matthew Rose Sorensen for example. The book also very much felt like a love letter to exploration and knowledge itself – which is actually pretty similar to the narrative in Jonathan Strange. As always Susanna Clarke is just an excellent writer from a technical standpoint as well, with a clear, elegant style that's a joy to read.

    Also, there's a lot of the story that really resonated with me on a personal level, as a neurodivergent individual with autism, ADHD and generalized anxiety disorder. I don't think Clarke intended it to be as such, but I found a lot of the story to be almost metaphorical to my own ADHD experience – the world being a distracting, loud and overwhelming experience and having this peaceful, quiet sanctuary as your "happy place". And Piranesi using his journal and cataloging his thoughts and his journeys throughout the house as a way to centre himself felt very much like something I do as well. Even the presence of the Other and Raphael, characters representing people in my life that have either manipulated me or been there to support me – it all felt very relatable. Even if Susanna Clarke didn't write it as a metaphor for neurodivergence, I guess that's what makes it a great piece of art, to be able to interpret it in a way the author may not have even thought of.

    I do have one nitpick with the book, and that is the fact that it almost felt rushed and a little too short. There is something to be said about brevity and not stretching out a story more than you need to, but with Piranesi it was the opposite, and it almost felt like a compressed, summarized version of a bigger, grander story. I do wish that the story was given a little bit more room to breathe, and I felt like the stakes escalated VERY quickly in the final third of the book. Things like Matthew/Piranesi spending time in the House exploring, coming back to the house with Sarah etc. – I wouldn't have minded a bit more time spent on those.

    Regardless, Piranesi is still a wonderful fantasy story and another banger from Susanna Clarke. I guess we wait another decade plus for the next book now…

    by keepfighting90

    Share.

    2 Comments

    1. GentlewomenNeverTell on

      She is very very sick and barely managed to get Piranesi out. Be glad you even got to read it.

    2. > Piranesi is just about the polar opposite of JS&MN in style and tone.

      I see what you’re saying, but I think this is a mistake. They both have similar themes about human hubris, magic being as dangerous as it is powerful, and how petty, human concerns like status, relative power, etc., take precedence over what should be awe and wonder in the face of a mysterious power.

      The sentence-level writing style is different (JS&MN is basically miming Jane Austen, the other is written from a mind captured by a foreign magic universe) but that difference makes sense “in-universe” based on the perspective they’re being written from.

      I’m glad you liked it! I loved both books a lot.

    Leave A Reply